Sean "Loverboy" Tilley is a user on social.nasqueron.org. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
Sean "Loverboy" Tilley @deadsuperhero

The Federated Web is not The Dark Web, but you know, some idiot journalist will eventually conflate the two terms.

@deadsuperhero but what if somebody sets up a mastodon on the TOR network. what then, huh?!

@kaniini But not all of the federated web is using TOR, nor is all of The Dark Web using federated communication apps.

@kaniini @deadsuperhero In that case if they federated with any instances outside TOR then there would be ActivityPub and OStatus data zipping in and out of exit nodes to and from the instance. Would kind of make using TOR pointless. So if it federated it all it would only do so with other instances within TOR.

It would be a different federation entirely...the "dark federation" (sounds like a Star Trek thing 🤔).

@kaniini @deadsuperhero It may be problematic to get a Tor node into the federated web as other nodes don't understand onion addresses, so most likely it wont be part of it. And even if it does, that would be the a small overlap between the two labels.

@tobias @kaniini It'd be interesting to see a truly p2p-client style approach to federated networking (on the desktop or mobile end, without the need for a server at all)

There have been a few recent approaches to the problem. Scuttlebutt approached it in a fairly novel way by assuming that data connections probably aren't persistent, and would rely on an alternate mechanism for fetching and storing updates to data.